Current:Home > InvestThis Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early -NextFrontier Finance
This Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early
View
Date:2025-04-17 22:07:12
Don't claim Social Security early for the wrong reasons
Many Americans fear for the future of Social Security, and this could be leading them to make some bad choices.
In fact, one recent study showed 44% of people think Social Security is going to run out of money before their retirement. This is one reason more than four in 10 people indicate they plan to claim Social Security between the ages of 62 and 65. By contrast, just 10% plan to wait until 70.
While it may seem smart to collect benefits ASAP in such a scenario, this is actually the worst possible reason to claim Social Security early. Here's why.
Making decisions related to Social Security because of a fear you won't get any benefits at all is a short-sighted choice that could cost you thousands of dollars. There are a few reasons for that.
Despite popular belief, Social Security is not in danger of running out of money. It has a steady revenue stream that comes from current workers' payroll taxes. This is not going to stop happening unless everyone in the U.S. stops working or unless the funding mechanism is changed -- which is extremely unlikely to occur.
It is true, however, that Social Security's trust fund is in danger of depletion by 2033. But if that happens, there would still be enough money coming from tax revenue to pay about 77% of the benefits promised. That's a hit, but it doesn't mean you won't get any of your retirement funds
Can I collect Social Security yet?It depends on when you were born.
Claiming Social Security early guarantees a smaller monthly check
The reality is, an early Social Security claim is going to mean you definitely get a smaller monthly benefit.
That's because you will get hit with early filing penalties if you claim before FRA. These could shrink your monthly checks by as much as 30% depending on how far ahead of schedule you start payments. And if you wait until FRA but not until age 70, you'll pass up delayed retirement credits that increase your monthly benefit up to 8% for each full year that you delay payments.
You do give up income by waiting to get benefits, but the majority of retirees are better off waiting until 70 because the larger monthly checks from claiming at that age add up to higher lifetime income from Social Security.
So, unless there are clear reasons why you want your benefits early -- such as concerns about your health or a desire to retire early that hinges on Social Security -- you should think very carefully before you make that choice. And definitely don't claim benefits prematurely out of fear of a future without them as that's unlikely to happen.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (73274)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- 'Diablo IV' Review: Activision Blizzard deals old-school devilish delights
- Ariana DeBose Speaks Out About Viral BAFTAs Rap in First Interview Since Awards Show
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $300 Tote Bag for Just $69
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Kenneth Anger, gay film pioneer and unreliable Hollywood chronicler, dies at 96
- 'To Name the Bigger Lie' is an investigation of the nature of truth
- 12 Small Black-Owned Etsy Stores That Will Be Your New Favorite Shops
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- James Marsden on little white lies and being the other guy
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Flooded with online hate, the musician corook decided to keep swimming
- Pride vs. Prejudice
- Emily Blunt, John Krasinski and More Celeb Couples Turning 2023 SAG Awards Into a Glamorous Date Night
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- In 'You Hurt My Feelings,' the stakes are low but deeply relatable
- 'The Late Americans' is not just a campus novel
- John Goodman tells us the dark secret behind all his lovable characters
Recommendation
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Dwyane Wade Thanks Daughter Zaya For Making Him a Better Human at 2023 NAACP Image Awards
Ariana DeBose Pokes Fun at Her Viral Rap at SAG Awards 2023
4 new books by Filipino authors to read this spring
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
South Korea, U.S. shirk North Korea's threats of counteractions, carry on planning for joint war games
Transcript: Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker on Face the Nation, March 5, 2023
Cormac McCarthy, American novelist of the stark and dark, dies at 89